The first Iron Man film was a decent movie. I probably didn't like it as well as most people did. It presented us with an interesting character and a fun story that ultimately ended in an unsatisfying way for me. However, I looked forward to the sequel to see what they would do with Tony Stark next. I definitely considered going to the theater to see Iron Man 2, but something kept me away. I'm glad I saved my money. I'm sure it would have been more impressive on the big screen, but there wasn't enough substance to make this film worth the price of admission. Nothing about Iron Man 2 got me excited for the inevitable follow up. There were some pretty sweet action sequences, but it wasn't enough to make up for the sloppy plotting and superficial characterizations. I didn't expect a masterpiece with this film, but what it delivered was definitely sub-standard. 3 out of 10.#103: Iron Man 2 (3/10)
The first Iron Man film was a decent movie. I probably didn't like it as well as most people did. It presented us with an interesting character and a fun story that ultimately ended in an unsatisfying way for me. However, I looked forward to the sequel to see what they would do with Tony Stark next. I definitely considered going to the theater to see Iron Man 2, but something kept me away. I'm glad I saved my money. I'm sure it would have been more impressive on the big screen, but there wasn't enough substance to make this film worth the price of admission. Nothing about Iron Man 2 got me excited for the inevitable follow up. There were some pretty sweet action sequences, but it wasn't enough to make up for the sloppy plotting and superficial characterizations. I didn't expect a masterpiece with this film, but what it delivered was definitely sub-standard. 3 out of 10.


